Off the Record, On the Issues with John

A new NCUA proposal would remove an automatic barrier in membership rules, signaling a more flexible, case-by-case approach.

By John Alexander, DakCU Director of Legislative & Regulatory Affairs

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) has opened a new field of membership proposal as part of its ninth deregulation package. The proposal would remove the current automatic bar that can apply when an associational group requires a person to buy a product or service to join. Instead of ending the review there, the agency would look at the full facts and decide whether the customer relationship is only incidental or whether it is really the main point of the group. Comments are due June 8, 2026.

What's Changing
Under the current setup, a product or service requirement can effectively knock a group out before the rest of the analysis even begins. Under the proposal, that one fact would no longer control the outcome by itself. The NCUA says it wants to eliminate what it calls an inflexible bar and return to a broader review of the group’s structure, activities, and overall circumstances.

What the Proposal Does Not Do
This is not a free pass for every group. The rule would keep the basic standard that associations based primarily on a client-customer relationship do not qualify. The proposal even keeps health clubs, including YMCAs, as an example of a group that does not meet the associational common bond test. The point is narrower than that. The agency is saying a purchase requirement should not be an automatic no by itself.

DakCU Perspective: Two Key Points
First, this proposal is limited. It applies to associational common bond rules for single and multiple common bond federal credit unions. It does not apply to occupational common bond charters, community charters, or federally insured state-chartered credit unions.

Second, it still matters. It shows the agency is willing to reopen field of membership questions that have been treated as settled. The NCUA has framed this ninth round of deregulation as an effort to remove unduly burdensome requirements, and Chairman Hauptman said the agency intends to keep moving on this phase of the deregulation project. That does not solve the larger field of membership issues we care about in the Dakotas, but it does show movement inside an area that has too often been boxed in by rigid interpretations.

The Bigger Takeaway
Field of membership should turn on whether the association is legitimate, whether the common bond is real, and whether the group actually reflects shared loyalties, mutual benefits, and mutual interests. It should not turn on a single technical fact that shuts the file before the full picture is reviewed. The NCUA’s own expansion framework already uses a totality of circumstances approach for associational common bond groups, and this proposal moves further in that direction.

Why It Matters Moving Forward
For Your Association, this proposal is not the end of the conversation. It is a narrow federal change. But it is still a useful sign. Any time the regulator shows a willingness to move away from automatic barriers and toward a more practical review, credit unions should pay attention. That is especially true in field of membership, where bad lines on paper can limit real service on the ground.
 
Stay Connected
For more information or to share your perspectives, feel free to contact me.  ​